Literasi Digital Bagi Remaja di DKI Jakarta pada Fenomena Display of Violence di Media Sosial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32509/pustakom.v7i1.4155Keywords:
literacy digital, display of violence, bystander intervention positive, social mediaAbstract
This research aims to provide an understanding of digital literacy to the wider community, especially to teenagers who use social media in DKI Jakarta so that they become agents of change from the dangers of the display of violence phenomenon (indulging in acts of violence on social media) to become positive intervention Bystanders who can exercise control. social media by observing the situation and being able to act firmly to help and stop all forms of violence on social media. The research method used is a case study, a type of qualitative descriptive research. Data collection techniques were done through observation, interviews, and document study. The results of the research show that the implementation of digital display of violence literacy among high school students in Jakarta is by looking at data which shows that teenage netizens in Indonesia still do not make positive comments or dare to speak up on social media regarding many things, including the issue of violence as part of bystander intervention. positive, there is a need for collaboration between the government and teaching staff, especially lecturers, to actively carry out digital literacy among teenagers.References
Agustini, P. (2021). Empat Pilar Literasi Dukung Transformasi Digital. Aptika.Kominfo.Go.Id. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2021/01/empat-pilar-literasi-untuk-dukung-transformasi-digital/
Anderson, C. A., Bushman, B. J., Bartholow, B. D., Cantor, J., Christakis, D., Coyne, S. M., Donnerstein, E., Brockmyer, J. F., Gentile, D. A., Green, C. S., Huesmann, R., Hummer, T., Krahé, B., Strasburger, V. C., Warburton, W., Wilson, B. J., & Ybarra, M. (2017). Screen violence and youth behavior. Pediatrics, 140(November), S142–S147. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758T
APJII. (2023). Survei APJII Pengguna Internet di Indonesia Tembus 215 Juta Orang. APJII.or.Id. https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/survei-apjii-pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-tembus-215-juta-orang#:~:text=Bisnis.com%2C JAKARTA - Survei,yang sebesar 275.773.901 jiwa.
Badruddin, S., & -, T. (2022). Pengaruh Sosial Media Terhadap Kesadaran Perawatan Anak pada Remaja Putri di Kecamatan Cilandak Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, 10(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.33603/publika.v10i1.7088
Blagg, R. D. (2023). bystander effect. Britannica.Com. https://www.britannica.com/topic/bystander-effect
Çalişir, G. (2015). A Research on Presentation of Violence in Social Media: Opinions of Facebook Users. Journal of Media Critiques, 1(2), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.17349/jmc115302
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Fifth Edit). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1319-x
Hamzah, R. E., & Putri, C. E. (2022). Fenomena Memancing Kesedihan Di Media Sosial (Sadfishing) Pada Literasi Digital Remaja. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 21(2), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v21i2.2290
Hayati, N. (2021). Media Sosial dan Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Online Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, Dan Budaya, 1(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.33830/humaya.v1i1.1858.2021
Hortensius, R., & de Gelder, B. (2018). From Empathy to Apathy: The Bystander Effect Revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417749653
Juliantari, N. K. (2017). Paradigma Analisis Wacana Dalam Memahami Teks Dan Konteks Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman. Acarya Pustaka, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.23887/ap.v3i1.12732
Mengü, M., & Mengü, S. (2015). Violence and Social Media. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 1(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.1-3-4
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1133305
Mulachela, H. (2022). Literasi Digital Adalah: Prinsip, Komponen, dan Manfaatnya. Katadata.Co.Id. https://katadata.co.id/safrezi/berita/61e8e7e14b563/literasi-digital-adalah-prinsip-komponen-dan-manfaatnya#:~:text=Pengertian Literasi Digital&text=Berdasarkan “Buku Kerangka Digital Indonesia,dengan kecakapan kognitif maupun teknikal.
Nawawi, H. (2017). Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia: Untuk Bisnis yang Kompetitif (7th ed.). Gadjah Mada University Press. https://ugmpress.ugm.ac.id/en/product/ekonomi-bisnis/manajemen-sumberdaya-manusia-untuk-bisnis-yang-kompetitif
Putri, C. E., & Hamzah, R. E. (2022). ANALISIS FENOMENA PENIPUAN IDENTITAS DIRI (CATFISHING) PADA LITERASI DIGITAL PENGGUNA MEDIA SOSIAL. 3(2), 67–78. https://ejournal-ibik57.ac.id/index.php/komunikata57/article/view/520/295
Recuero, R. (2015). Social Media and Symbolic Violence. Social Media and Society, 1(1), 0–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115580332
Rizky, A. (2020). Microsoft: Netizen Indonesia Paling Tidak Sopan se-Asia Tenggara. Winpoin.Com. https://winpoin.com/microsoft-netizen-indonesia-paling-tidak-sopan-se-asia-tenggara/
Sugihartati, R. (2023). Media Sosial dan Tindak Kekerasan Remaja. Mediaindonesia.Com. https://mediaindonesia.com/opini/565134/media-sosial-dan-tindak-kekerasan-remaja
Susanto, E. H. (2017). Media Sosial Sebagai Pendukung Jaringan Komunikasi Politik. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i3.123
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (Sixth Edition (Ed.)). Sage Publications, Inc.
